Presbyterian Conference
Presbyterians in America held a week-long conference this past week. The meeting of Christians provided an opportunity for political radicals to continue their campaign against the Biblically-promised rebirth of Israel and the return of "His Chosen People" to "their Promised Land".The story is reported by the NY Sun in a piece headlined:
Presbyterian Church Proposals Could Reopen Wounds With Jews
"At least 19 Jewish organizations, ranging from Americans for Peace Now to the Zionist Organization of America, have spoken out against some of the so-called overtures to be debated at the week long biennial meeting of Presbyterians in America." -moreYour thoughts?
Labels: anti-Zionism, Christians, Divestment, Presbyterian, U.S.A.
Submit To:→Digg it →del.icio.us →Technorati Favorites
24 Comments:
My mother (of blessed memory) always warned me;"scratch a goy and you'll find an anti-Semite."
I poo pooed her but life has shown me she was right.
Just proves that despite supposedly enlightened policies and minds of the goyim, the only ones we Jews can rely on is god and other Jews. We truly are alone in this world.
Presbyterian Divestment is just another name for the old Arab boycott! Shameful! SAL
I agree these are not Christians, and just radical political leftist types. Recall that the Religious Right, whatever their motives, attempt as much as they can to support the land of Israel (all of it) as being the homeland, historical and present day, of the Jewish people.
No, Eidel and Avi, you are not right. You can scratch many goyim these days, and so hard that nothing is left but their faithfulness to Israel and the Jewish people. I am one of them and I live in Israel. Jews need to come back to God, but they are not alone, despite the despicable arrogance of the Presbyterian Church.
It is stories like this that make me ashamed to say that I am a Presbyterian. I hope that all those of the Jewish faith realize that the views of the Presbyterian Church USA are certainly NOT the universal view of all Presbyterians. We of the so-called "Bible Belt" Presbyterians do not subscribe to the views of the northern radical churchs in any way. We do not want divestment
in any form, and are firm believers of Genesis 12:3. I may be a "goy" in your estimation, but I most certainly am not an anti-Semite
I think that the editorial today was brilliant in many ways.
I am a Christian. I believe what the TORAH and the prophets say about Israel's right to exist in ALL of the Land of Israel.
I believe that Israel can only rely upon Hashem for their safety and to fulfill the mandate of ALL Jews returning to the Land.
Please remember that I can call myself a sheep(Christian) but if underneath all of the wool I am a wolf then that makes me a wolf(nonbeliever)!
Count me in as another Christian goy who is ashamed of the Presbyterian Divestment nonsense. I've had some issues even with members of my own Baptist church who are at odds with my support of Israel.
Another Baptist heard from: I spent a year in Israel so I could learn Hebrew, and in that time, not once was I threatened by a Jew. My hosts made me feel welcome and secure the whole time, and this was during the first Shalom haGalil. How could I spit in the face of such hospitality? The Presbyterian Conference attendees need to reread Scripture and stop interpreting it in pseudo-spiritualized gnostic fashion.
Climbing off my soapbox now...
How things like this must cause G-d to cry! I'm a Christian, but I'm not this type of Christian.
I've a print of a painting which says a lot. It's called "This is Not My Teaching", and it shows Jesus walking through a Jewish ghetto. Indeed, the abuse of the Jews is NOT what He taught. It is the insecurity of man that causes such horrible teachings.
Israel is Israel...the land of the the Lord G-d who has given it as an inheritance to the children of Abraham and Isaac and Jacob. The only people who fit that description are the Jews. We should support His true Chosen.
Sigh! As an active Presbyterian, I can tell you that the article totally ignores how Presbyterian polity works. Basically any member Presbytery can propose an overture to the General Assembly. (Presbyteries are tne fundamental unit of the church. For example, I my church is a member of the Presbytery of Northern New England, and as an Elder of the church I have attended and voted at Presbytery meetings. That is where the name Presbyterian comes from, duh!)
Any Presbytery can send an Overture to General Assembly. What the GA does with most overtures is to send them to a committee to be considered--just like Congress with bills introduced by members, in fact the House of Representatives rules are based on Presbyterian polity. Also just like in Congress, where a bill is sent for consideration is important. This resulted in the misunderstanding in 2004. Sending the overture on divestiture to the Investment Committee was equivalent to dropping it.
If an Overture is sent to a committee which will send a (possibly modified) version of the overture back to GA as a change to the Book of Order, then the vote in GA is actually on the issue, not a procedural vote. Of course, since the GA meets every two years, that occurs at the earliest two years later. The net result, as intended, is that issues of the day come and go, and never get to an up-and-down GA vote.
Sorry this has gone on so long, but it is necessary to understand what is going on. Are there a few Presbyteries with a majority of extremely "liberal", but pro-Palestinian churches? Yes. Do their overture ever go very far at GA? No. But those same few churches consider it a victory when they get one of their overtures through the local Presbytery and sent to GA. They send out press releases, and the rest of us have to deal with the bad press.
Also realize that churches vary widely in size, but whether a church has 20 members or 20,000 it gets the same number of votes in Presbytery meetings. So although these people are a small minority of PC(USA) they can and do make a lot of noise. There are other Presbyterian denominations in the United States as well, but the press seems to ignore them.
There are many "nominal Christians", that like secular Jews, find their remarks, when it fits an agenda of a fifth colmun inch of fifth columnists, repeated.
My take on the news item is that someone or several someones don't have a really solid scriptural basis for trying to make peace between Philistines that prophetically are always going to oppose Israel. This isn't, as Bones has observed in past remarks, New Testament prophecy, but the words written by Isaiah, Daniel, Ezekiel and others.
I've observed that there are folks that seem to think that the Commandments are a Chinese menu, this group appears to be another
What eidel and avi posted above, above goys being unreliable as allies, is quite untrue on an *individual basis*. I'm a post-Christian goy (even a neo-gnostic) and I'm 100% behind Israel. I would lay down my life for Israel if I thought it would really help. However, what eidel and avi have said is sadly quite true on a *group basis*. The major non-Jewish groups that could be and should be defending Israel are just not doing it. They include the UN and the EU but also the US. Bush, I think, remains personally loyal but Rice has sold out and the polls indicate that the US people at large will vote in Obama who will surely not defend Israel.
I was moved to tears when I recently read Hillel Halkin's "Israel's Lonely Last Resort", moved because I just know he's not exaggerating. In political terms, Israel is alone and I can but pray that she has the strength to get through all this alone. It is not a hopeless prayer but it is a deeply shameful one.
i am a christian and fully believe that these people in your comic strip are wrong. God never recalled his covenant with the jews, and promised Israel (the land allotted to jews) as an everlasting possession. any way heres one Christian saying keep on fighting the good fight.
bill
To our Jewish Friends.. Hang in there... G-D is not finished with us Goyim Yet.. And Thanks Be to G-D that many of our Jewish friends have invested in us to teach us of our crimes against G-D's chosen people... To our Presbyterian friends.. I invite you to join us in Kansas City, for our future events.. Below was our big event
a day of repentence to beg G-D to forgive us (Christians) and to also beg his chosen People to forgive us.. We held this at night at a local Synagogue and had about 600 Christian and Jews ... for a night that many will never forget... hopefully it was a beginning of an awakening of all that call theirselves Christian.. And a thread of Hope and a beginning of restoring our Jewish Friends to the place G-D puts you...
Below is a blurp from my e-mail.. This event was extended first as a full page add with many local Pastors and Christian Leaders names printed on the add asking The Jewish community to please join us to help us to beg G-D to forgive us..
Christian and Jewish Reconciliation
Tuesday, May 13, 2008 7:00 pm at KI Synagogue
Ministries of New Life is having this event at KI. The goal of the event is to "restore the breach between Christians and the Jewish people, created by centuries of cruelty to the Jewish people through the Crusades, forced conversions, expulsions and annihilation . . . and Kansas City has been called to lead the way," said Marilyn Griffin, founder of Ministries of New Life.
Please rsvp for this event at http://www.ministriesofnewlife.com/rsvp_for_repentance_meeting.htm
http://www.ministriesofnewlife.com/
I am very sure Marilyn would be happy to share with any group how to host this in your state! If you want a more Jewish view.. The Jewish Chronicle wrote an article on it I believe.....
Dear reader,
A razor sharp cartoon about the real intentions
of the European churches.
Nothing has changed since 1933 - 1945.
Churches didn't like the Jews since Anno Domini.
Churches thought the Jews did not play a part
anymore in God's history since Anno Domini.
Churches thought they became the leading actor
in God's history on earth.
Churches thought Jews had to vanish from earth,
because the Jews had been replaced by the Church.
And there should not be a place anymore for the Jews.
Churches did not utter any protests against
the fascist termination machine, who did
what churches thought.
1948 was a historical year in God's agenda.
Churches became second rate players.
Churches did not learn in sixty years : 1948 - 2008.
Churches don't understand that the Head of the Church :
that Jew from Anno Domini,
is nowadays busy in Israel.
He went with His Folks from Europe to Israel.
The Head of the Church has been 2000 years
with His Folks. He never replaced the Jews.
He's coming back in Yerushalayim within
eight, nine years.
The European Churches, without Head,
are becoming angry. And we see the
political radicals nowadays in the Church.
That Church has become the Left Church,
in two meanings :
1. Left >< Right
The Left Church is not anymore a right, honest church.
The Left Church has become a villainous Church ...
2. Left in the sense of leaving behind.
The Left Church is an orphan Church,
a Church without His Head : the Jew Yahushuah
(Greek : Jesus).
The Left Church has inherited that anti-Semitism.
Has become Israel's enemy, God's enemy,
Torah's enemy.
And that's what we see in this razor sharp cartoon.
Yours,
Shalom,
Hans, christianzionist
Jews like Eidel and Avi need to read just a bit of the New Testament to learn that the Church is like a loaf of bread with yeast (sin) in it which will infect the whole loaf. The Church is like a mustard "tree" (?) in whose branches black birds (messengers of satan) roost. These are the words of Jesus himself.
The Bible (New T agrees with Old T) specifically says that God has chosen Abraham-Isaac-Jacob's descendants to carry out His plan of salvation to the entire earth. They also would administrate (rule) it all.
The land of Israel does not belong to Israel, but to God Himself. BUT He has sworn an oath to Abraham that his seed (through Isaac and Jacob) would inherit it OLAM (forever). Though they would be kicked out (Deut. 28), they ever would return till Messiah came, and from then on, there would nevermore be any ouster.
I believe the Bible, and therefore I am 100% pro-Israel, including that they should occupy and control Israel (which according to Ezekiel, is to extend up into Lebanon and across to the Euphrates River; and to include Ammon, Moab, and Edom (Transjordan) which Benjamin is to possess.
God said it, I believe it, and that settles it. Let Israel not forget whose courtyard the outermost of the Temple is; God surely did not create it to be uninhabited!
May I one day enjoy the privilege of being listed in Yad Vashem as a "righteous goy". But don't trust every animal with wool. Some is only glued on. :-)
Not all Protestants are like the presbyterian's. My church firmly believes the Bible to be the inerrant word of the Lord, and thus expect the Lord to fulfill the last 2 sentences in Amos the prophet says that Israel shall be established forever.
And i appreciate the Jews, because i know that the number of Nobel Prizes in Medicine that has been rewarded to Jewish people has been at least 48. So i want to express my appreciation and love for Israel.
Also don't worry because the prophets has said that persia [iran]will be destroyed when as an ally with the land of the utter most north [russia] invades Israel from the north and the LORD will use earthquakes, hailstones to destroy this alliance against Israel. Also the LORD will cause that alliance to fight among themselves to add to the slaying of these enemies of Israel.
i am one gentile who does love Isrel.
i am sorry for a second posting
But i want to let my Jewish friends here know that the Lord has said in the Bible that Israel willl have their third temple by a 7 year treaty made possible by a man that comes with a platform of peace. DO NOT TRUST THAT MAN, because the Bible says that 3 and a half years after making that treaty he will go into Israel's temple and declare himself to be "god". i think it is the prophet Daniel who said something like this individual will have an alliance with 10 kings of which he will overthrow 3 kings. Also Daniel said of that individual that he will have a mouth that blasphemes the GOD of Abraham, Issac and Jacob. Also it says that this individula will have an attempt on his life of which he will survive. This individual will also have another individual as his ally who be religious and demand that everyone on earth worship the person who will make the treaty that allows Israel to have their third temple. In addition the Bible says that all individuals who worship the statue will recieve a mark on their bodies and with out that mark you cannot buy or sell and those who doesn't recieve this mark will also be objects of a killing spree.
In addition the prophet Zechariah has said that when the Messiah comes he will split the Mount of Olives into two parts going east to west so that people may take shelter from what the Messiah will do to Israels enemies it talks about in Zechariah [this will be distinct from the invasion from the north that i mentioned included iran].
This is all i can remember of what i learned right now - but i just wanted to warn the Jews about that individual who will make it possible for the third temple because he is not the Messiah.
One final thing i want to say - because i am friendly with Israel. In ancient Israel at least once i think was mentioned in prophet Isaiah that Israel sent its army against the enemy singing Praise to the Lord and the Lord destroyed the enemy by thier fighting and the enemy killing each other. My idea is that it would help Israel when its army goes against hamas and hezbollah to sing praises to the Lord like they did as recorded in Isaiah.
thank you for being patient with me and reading this because i feel i am doing something to help Israel if only someone would at least consider what i have said.
stanley
CUFI.org
For those of us who actually follow Yeshua's teachings, betrayal of His Jewish brothers and sisters is a disgrace.
That "brotherhood" seems a one-way street ---like usual.
JUDAISM 101 – JUDAISM IN ITS OWN WORDS
WHO IS HUMAN? WHO IS NOT?
"You are adam ["man"], but goyim [gentiles] are not called adam ["man"]." Kerithoth 6b
“The progeny of the Goyim is like an animal.” Sanhedrin 74b
“All Gentile children are animals.” Yebamoth 98a
"...'living soul' designates Israel because they are children of the Almighty, and their souls, which are holy, come from Him. From whence come the souls of otherpeoples? R[abbi] Eleazar said: 'They obtain souls from those sides of the left which convey impurity, and therefore they are all impure and defile those who have contact with them.'...'living soul' refers to Israel, who have holy living souls from above, and 'cattle and creeping thing and beast of the earth,' to the other peoples who are not 'living soul," but who are as we have said." Bereshith 47a
"The Jew by his source and in his very essence is entirely good. The goy, by his source and his very essence, is completely evil. This is not simply a matter of religious distinction, but rather of two completely different species." Rabbi Saadya Grama, Romemut Yisrael Ufarashat Hagalut ("Jewish Superiority and the Question of Exile") 2003.
“Souls of non-Jews come entirely from the female part of the Satanic sphere. For this reason souls of non-Jews are called evil.” [Yesaiah Tishbi, Torat ha-Rave-ha-Kelippahnbe-Kabbalat ha-Ari (The Theory of Evil and the Satanic Sphere in Kabbalah) 1942, reprinted 1982] The Messianic age of restoration and redemption (tikkun olam) forecast by the religion of Judaism and spoon-fed to their partisans among the goyim, posits a world restored to universal harmony and justice. That’s the cover story, anyway. But the truth it is somewhat more macabre, as Tishby relates: “… the presence of Israel among the nations mends the world, but not the nations of the world…. It does not bring the nations closer to holiness, but rather it extracts the holiness from them and thereby destroys their ability to exist… [T]he purpose of the full redemption is to destroy the vitality of all the peoples.” ], Michael Hoffman, Judaism Discovered: A Study of the Anti-Biblical Religion of Racism, Self-Worship, Superstition, and Deceit, ISBN 13: 9780970378453, pp.774-775
Because Gentiles are not human, Gentiles are owed no debt of morality or decency - not honesty [Baba Kamma 113a], not property [Baba Mezia 24a], not even life! — “The best of the Gentiles should all be killed” Soferim 15, 10
"Some of the Turks and the nomads in the North, and the Blacks and the nomads in the South, and those who resemble them in our climates. And their nature is like the nature of mute animals, and according to my opinion they are not on the level of human beings, and their level among existing things is below that of a man and above that of a monkey, because they have the image and the resemblance of a man more than a monkey does." Maimonides explaining who is not fit “to participate in the world to come,” Guide for the Perplexed, Book III, chapter 51 cited in Israel Shahak, Hebrew University Professor, Jewish History, Jewish Religion: The Weight of Three Thousand Years. London: Pluto Press, 1997. p. 25.
"... the explanation of the matter, [is to be found] in light of what Rabbi Chayim Vital wrote in Shaar HaKedushah (and in Etz Chayim, Portal 5, ch. 2) — that every Jew, whether righteous or wicked, possesses two souls, as it is written, “And neshamot (souls) which I have made. ... The second, uniquely Jewish, soul is truly “a part of G-d above, The souls of the nations of the world (the Gentiles), however, emanate from the other, unclean kelipot which contain no good whatever, as is written in Etz Chayim, Portal 40, ch. 3, that all the good that (Gentiles) do, is done out of selfish motives. So the Gemara comments on the verse, “The kindness of (Gentiles) is sin” — that all the charity and kindness done by (Gentiles) of the world is only for their self-glorification..." (Chapters 1 and 2) The lower category consists of three completely unclean and evil kelipot, containing no good whatever... From them flow and are derived the souls of all the nations of the world (Gentiles), and the sustaining force of their bodies. Also derived from these kelipot are the souls of all living creatures that are unclean and forbidden to be eaten, and the sustaining force of their bodies." Tanya, Chapter 6
http://www.chabad.org/library/article_cdo/aid/7880/jewish/Chapter-1.htm
"Rabbi Kook the Elder, the revered father of the messianic tendency in Jewish fundamentalism, said, 'The difference between a Jewish soul and the souls of non-Jews—all of them in all different levels—is greater and deeper than the difference between a human soul and the souls of cattle.' Rabbi Kook's entire teaching... is followed devoutly by, among others, those who have led the settler movement in the occupied West Bank... According to the ideologies which underlie Gush Emunum, the militant West Bank settlers group, and Hasidism, non-Jews have 'satanic souls'... Members of Gush Emunum argue that 'what appears to be confiscation of Arab-owned land for subsequent settlement by Jews is in reality not an act of stealing but one of sanctification.' From their perspective the land is redeemed by being transfered from the satanic to the divine sphere... Common to both the Talmud and the Halacha, Orthodox religious law, is a differentiation between Jews and non-Jews. The highly revered Rabbi Menachem Mandel Schneerson, who headed the Chabad movement and wielded great influence in Israel as well [and proclaimed himself messiah], explained that 'The difference between a Jewish and a on-Jewish person stems from the common expression: 'Let us differentiate.' Thus, we do not have a case of profound change in which a person is merely on a superior level. Rather we have a case of 'let us differentiate' between totally different species. This is what needs to be said about the body: the body of a Jewish person is of a totally different quality from the body of all nations of the world.'" Allan C. Brownfield, "It Is Time to Confront the Exclusionary Ethnocentrism," Issues of the American Council for Judaism, Winter 2000, cited in Michael Hoffman, Judaism Discovered, pp.365-366.
"And for Christians let there be no hope..." Birkat HaMinim, "Benediction" #12 of the Shmone Esreh
"The best of the gentiles should all be killed."Sopherim 15, rule 10
Rabbi Eliyahu exhorts the killing of women and children:
http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1180527966693&pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull
"It is our duty to praise the Master of All, to ascribe greatness to the molder of primeval creation, for He has not made us like the nations of the lands, for He has not assigned our portion like theirs nor our lot like theirs, for they bow to vanity and emptiness and pray to a god who cannot save--man, ash, blood, bile, stinking flesh, maggot, defiled men and women, adulterers and adulteresses, dying in their iniquity and rotting in their wickedness, worn out dust, rot of maggot [and worm]--and pray to a god who cannot save." Aleinu from Judaic prayer book, Two Nations in Your Womb, Israel Jacob Yuval, University of California Press, 2006, p.119
ABORTION: WHO IS HUMAN? WHO IS NOT?
Judaism excuses abortion through the "rodef" pilpul, that the baby is a rodef, a pursuer, an aggressor, whose life the mother may take. (among many, see "Jewish Law Favors Stem Cell Research," Jewish Journal of Greater Los Angeles, July 30, 2004) Judaism, teaches that the baby is not "nefesh," a person, until it is born.
"Rashi, the venerated twelfth century Judaic interpreter of the Bible and Talmud, says of the fetus" 'lav nefesh hu - it is not a person." Rabbi Meir Abulafia decreed, 'So long as the fetus is inside the womb, it is not a nefesh and the Torah has no pity on it." The noted Judaic legal scholar Rabbi Isaac Schorr stated: 'The sense of the Talmud is that a fetus is not a person' ( Responsa Koah Schorr, no. 20 ["responsa" are authoritative in Judaism and supersede the plain text of the "Hebrew Bible."]). The Talmud contains the expression 'ubar yerech imo' -the fetus is the thigh of its mother, i.e., the fetus is deemed to be part of the pregnant woman's body. The Greek philosopher Aristotle regarded the unborn child in its first seven days as a 'secretion' (ekrysis). In rabbinic law the status of 'secretion' lasts for the first forty days of gestation. In Judaism the woman is not regarded as pregnant until the baby in her womb is more than forty days old.
"Contrary to these traditions of Judaism, God did not say in the bible that He recognized the unborn baby only after forty days. He said He recognized it as a being before the child had even formed in the womb (Jeremiah 1:5) As usual, the rabbis go God one better and establish a term of forty days before recognition can be conferred, and that rabbinic recognition is only of the pregnancy itself, not of the humanity of the child.
"The matter does not rest at the forty day limit, however. In the familiar pattern of rabbinic modification, supplementation, and emendation, enough of these are generated to allow abortion at any time during the pregnancy for almost any reason, however fanciful or arbitrary. For example, if it is decided that an aborted baby does not look like a baby after it has been aborted, then it is not considered to have been an aborted child. [Tosefta Niddah 4:5-6]
"Since the 1973 Supreme Court decision, Roe v. Wade, the standard American abortion procedure is considerably Talmudic in nature, since the Talmud specifically states that if the unborn baby is adduced to be a rodef the rabbis authorize that it can be chopped up at any time: 'They chop up the child in her womb.' [Mishnah Ohalot 7:6]" - Michael Hoffman, Judaism Discovered, ISBN 9780970378453, pp. 878-879.
JUDAISM’S HERMENEUTIC OF DECEIT
SIX PERMISSIBLE CATEGORIES OF LYING:
scholarship (including Torah scholarship), sexuality, and hospitality
The Talmud: The Steinsaltz Edition, Vol II, p.49
lying to gentiles (Baba Kamma 113a)
for "peace" (meaning, "it's OK to lie to keep out of trouble") (Yebamoth 65b)
when everyone should know you are lying, "guzmah" (Hullin 90b)
It is strictly forbidden to moser [inform the non-Judaic authorities on] either a Jewish person or his property. One who mosers a Jewish person or his property has no share in the world to come. (Shulchan Aruch, Choshen Mishpat, 388)
“CONTEXT”
"'Context' is everything for the defenders of the Talmud. Fair enough. But by 'context' they do not mean taking into account the surrounding text, but rather submitting to Judaism's own narrative about itself, which includes how it presents problem texts to non-Judaic audiences.... The rabbis even deny in many cases that there is a plain meaning....It is enough that [the rabbi] states it and gentiles believe it; anything else is 'antisemitic.' This pattern of intimidation and thought control is repeated with monotonous effect, by thought cops and apologists for Judaism. It is a stock response intended to frighten off the opposition, premised mainly on the moral authority of the declarative sentences used by the 'expert' on Judaism. Debate ('polemic') on the part of informed skeptics is not permitted, since it constitutes the 'misuse' of a scholar's knowledge of rabbinic texts. Debating tactics and polemical tools are reserved solely for rabbis and their allies, along with just a dash of permissible dissimulation to leaven the burden of swallowing the pottage. And when deception and 'out of context' statements serve to advance Judaism, they are all well and good...." Michael Hoffman, Judaism Discovered: A Study of the Anti-Biblical Religion of Racism, Self-Worship, Superstition, and Deceit. ISBN 13: 9780970378453 pages 137-138
NOAHIDE LAW
"If a Noahite is striving in the learning of Torah... reveals new aspects of Torah, he may be PHYSICALLY RESTRAINED and informed that he is liable for CAPIAL PUNISHMENT... If the court that is established in consonance with the Seven Universal Laws gives the DEATH PENALTY to a Noahite, the EXECUTION is an atonement for the person's past transgression... Furthermore, the Noahite must experience REINCARNATION to be able to atone for transgressions he has done." Chaim Clorfene & Yakov Rogalsky, "The Path of the Righteous Gentile: An Introduction to the Seven Laws of the children of Noah," (Feldheim Publishers, 1987) p. 42 (The book bears an official letter of approval of its contents by Rabbi Mendel Feldman, Shearith Israel Congregation.)
"The Christians are idolaters, and Sunday is their holiday..." [Maimonides, Mishneh Torah, Avodah Zorah, 9;4]
"The Christians are worshipers of Avodah Zorah ["idolatry"]" [Maimonides, Mishneh Torah, Ma'akhalot Assurot, 11:7]
"It is a mitzvah [religious duty], however, to eradicate Jewish traitors, minim, and apikorsim, ["heretics," including sincere Judaic converts to Christianity] and to cause them to descend to the pit of destruction, since they cause difficulty to the Jews and sway the people away from God, as did Jesus of Nazareth and his students, and Tzadok, Baithos, and their students. May the name of the wicked rot." [Maimonides, Mishneh Torah, Chapter 10]
"... a gentile who worships false gods is liable, [for the death penalty] provided he worships them in the accepted manner [in other words, insincere worship such as (1) faking worship to obtain business or social advantage, as the Marranos, or (2) denying Jesus' divinity, does not earn the death penalty] . A gentile is executed for every type of foreign worship which a Jewish court would consider worthy of capital punishment." [Maimonides, Hilchot Melachim XI, Mishneh Torah]
The Jewish Encyclopedia affirms that the punishment for Christian "idolatry" is beheading. See:
"Laws, Noachian," Jewish Encyclopedia entry,
http://www.jewishencyclopedia.com/view.jsp?artid=113&letter=L
REINCARNATION
"The sages of the true wisdom teach that every Jewish soul must REINCARNATE many times until it has fulfilled all the 613 mitzvos in action, speech, and thought." Shulchan Aruch HaRav: Hilchos Talmud Torah 1:4
Rabbi Ovadia Yosef on the REINCARNATION of Judaic souls:
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/middle-east/rabbi-says-holocaust-victims-were-reincarnations-of-sinners-711547.html
"If a Noahite is striving in the learning of Torah... reveals new aspects of Torah, he may be physically restrained and informed that he is liable for capital punishment... If the court that is established in consonance with the Seven Universal Laws gives the death penalty to a Noahite, the execution is an atonement for the person's past transgression... Furthermore, the Noahite must experience REINCARNATION to be able to atone for transgressions he has done." Chaim Clorfene & Yakov Rogalsky, "The Path of the Righteous Gentile: An Introduction to the Seven Laws of the children of Noah," (Feldheim Publishers, 1987) p. 42 (The book bears an official letter of approval of its contents by Rabbi Mendel Feldman, Shearith Israel Congregation.)
TORAH
"This is not an uncommon impression and one finds it sometimes among Jews as well as Christians - that Judaism is the religion of the Hebrew Bible. It is, of course, a fallacious impression. Judaism is not the religion of the Bible." [Rabbi Ben Zion Bokser, Judaism and the Christian Predicament, New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1967, p.59, 159]
"The Jewish religion as it is today traces its descent, without a break, through all the centuries, from the Pharisees. Their leading ideas and methods found expression in a literature of enormous extent, of which a very great deal is still in existence. The Talmud is the largest and most important single member of that literature, and round it are gathered a number of Midrashim, partly legal (Halachic) and partly works of edification (Haggadic). This literature, in its oldest elements, goes back to a time before the beginning of the Common Era, and comes down into the Middle Ages. Through it all run the lines of thought which were first drawn by the Pharisees, and the study of it is essential for any real understanding of Pharisaism." [Universal Jewish Encyclopedia, Vol. 3 pg. 474]
“Pharisaism became Talmudism, Talmudism became Medieval Rabbinism, and Medieval Rabbinism became Modern Rabbinism. But throughout these changes of name, inevitable adaptation of custom, and adjustment of Law, the spirit of the ancient Pharisee survives unaltered.” [Rabbi Dr. Finkelstein, The Pharisees: The Sociological Background of Their Faith, pg. xxi]
"The Talmud is the written form of that which in the time of Jesus, was called the 'Tradition of the Elders,' and to which He makes frequent allusions." [Michael L. Rodkinson, The History of the Talmud: From The Time Of Its Formation About 200 B. C. Up To The Present Time, Kessinger Publishing, LLC (June 8, 2006), ISBN-13: 978-1428631366, p.70]
Don’t get suckered into one of the oldest rabbinical tricks, the claim that the Talmud is based on "Torah." A Christian assumes that "Torah" = Pentateuch, but there's the trick. In Judaism there are at least FIVE definitions of Torah. Here's the proof:
Please note FOUR definitions of Torah in the Jewish Encyclopedia's entry on Torah:
“Originally, in order to maintain the distinction between the written Torah (see written law) and various traditional interpretations, customs and practices, the rabbis forbade the commitment to writing of the additional material. However, when it became too voluminous and chaotic conditions made oral transmission too uncertain, the ban was lifted and the material organized and transcribed in the form of the Mishnah, the Talmud, and other rabbinic works. The rabbis expressed their view that 'two Torahs' were given at Sinai, a Written Torah [Torah She Bich Tav, DEFINITION #1] and an Oral Torah [Torah SheBeal Peh, DEFINITION #2] (see oral law) and that at least some of the oral traditions relating to the meaning of basic biblical concepts were as authoritative as the written text (see halakah le-mosheh mi-sinai) In a sense the Oral Torah came to be regarded as more important than the Written Torah inasmuch as the explanations and understanding of the latter depended upon the former. A third meaning of the word ‘Torah’ therefore includes elements of the Oral Torah, which are considered authoritative or deoraita ---'from the Torah.' Finally in its broadest sense, the word 'Torah' is sometimes used to refer to the entire corpus of Halahak and Aggadah, [DEFINITION #3] Written and Oral, from the Bible up to and including the latest Responsa and homiletical interpretations of the rabbis [DEFINITION #4]....” [The New Encyclopedia of Judaism, Geoffrey Wigoder editor in Chief, New York: New York University Press, 2002, ISBN 0814793996, page 778]
Please note a FIFTH definition of Torah according to the Holy Father's favorite rabbi, “a great scholar” [Benedict XVI, Jesus of Nazareth, p.71]:
“... The rabbi constituted the projection of the divine on earth. Honor was due him more than to the scroll of the Torah, for through his learning and logic he might alter the very content of Mosaic revelation. He was Torah [DEFINITION #5], not merely because he lived by it, but because at his best he constituted as compelling an embodiment of the heavenly model as did a Torah scroll itself.” [Rabbi Jacob Neusner, “The Phenomenon of the Rabbi in Late Antiquity: II The Ritual of 'Being a Rabbi' in Later Sasanian Babylonia,” Numen, Vol.17, Fasc. 1., Feb., 1970, pp.3-4]
It gets worse because these “Torah” are on an ever widening trajectory from God. Consider explicit corollaries of the great scholar's presumption that, because the rabbis are divine, they can “alter the very content of Mosaic revelation.”
“...the Babylonian Talmud represents God in the flesh...” Rabbi Jacob Neusner, Rabbinic Judaism, Minneapolis MN: Augsburg Fortress, 1995. p. 62
"The Bavli [Babylonian Talmud] has formed the definitive statement of Judaism from the time of its closure to the present day." Rabbi Jacob Neusner, quoted by Norman F. Cantor, The Sacred Chain: A History of the Jews, page 112)
The occultic portion of the Talmud, the Kaballa, at Tikkunei Zohar 1:27b refers to the Mischnah of the Talmud as “the burial place of Moses.” The reference is an apt double entendre because the Talmud at Shabbat 15 teaches that it supersedes and nullifies the Old Testament, so “buries” the Pentateuch of Moses.
“Think not that I will accuse you to the Father: There is one that accuseth you, Moses, in whom you trust. For if you did believe in Moses, you would perhaps believe me also; for he wrote of me. But if you do not believe his writings, how will you believe my words?” John 5:43-47
Since converts from Judaism revealed the foundational teachings of Judaism, much effort has been invested in sanitizing vernacular translations of the Talmud.
These sanitized editions are useful to the rabbis: "See it's not there." Or "The tractate is about 'Balaam'"
In the sanitized Talmud editions numerous code word substitutions are used for Christians (min, Cuthean, Egyptian, Epicurean, etc.) and Jesus of Nazareth ("that man," "the carpenter," "Balaam," "ben Pandera, a reference to the Talmud's teaching that Jesus was the b-stard of a wh-re who committed adultery with a Roman soldier named Pandera, and even blank spaces).
The Talmud (Torah SheBeal Peh) teaches that Jesus was a b-stard born of an adulterous relationship (Kallah 51a) of a wh-re (Sanhedrin 106a) and that He is now in Hell boiling in feces because he "worshipped a brick" and, sem-n because he is accused of sexual perversion. (Gittin 57a).
The Talmud Sanhedrin 43a boasts that the Sanhedrin convicted Jesus and, at the Jewish court's instigation, He was crucified, “hanged,” even though the Romans were “inclined toward acquittal” of Jesus; therefore Jewish denial and blame-shifting to the Romans is a lie. The infamous Toldoth Jeschu, Maimonides' Hilkoth Akun V, 3 and Letter to Yemen), and the 1905 Jewish Encyclopedia (page 170), all boast of Jewish responsibility for Christ's death. The Talmud notes that Jesus deserved four more deaths. Sanhedrin 52a suggests Jesus should have been strangled while immersed in dung. There are other Talmudic passages that describe Jesus as an idolatrous sex freak, practicing black magic —and more
Pursuing the anti-Biblical nature of Judaism and its Talmud:
“On the surface, Scripture plays little role in the Mishanaic system, The Mishnah [of the Talmud] rarely cites a verse of Scripture, refers to Scripture as an entity, links its own ideas to those of Scripture, or lays claim to originate in what Scripture has said, even by indirect or remote allusion to a Scriptural verse of teaching... Formally, redactionally, and linguistically the Mishnah stands in splendid isolation from Scripture....the Mishnah constitutes Torah. [definition #2 ‘Written Torah’] It too is a statement of revelation, 'Torah revealed to Moses at Sinai.' But this part of revelation has come down in a form different from the well-known, written part, the Scripture. This tradition truly deserves the name 'tradition,' because for a long time it was handed down orally, not in writing, until given the written formulation now before us in the Mishnah.... Since some of the named authorities in the chain of tradition appear throughout the materials of the Mishnah, the claim is that what these people say comes to them from Sinai through the processes of qabbalah and massoret --handing down 'traditioning.' So the reason... that the Mishnah does not cite Scripture is that it does not have to.” [Rabbi Jacob Neusner, The Mishnah: A New Translation. New Haven CT: Yale University Press, 1988. pp. xxxv-xxxvi].
Note the casual admission that both “qabbalah and massoret [the vaunted, but bowdlerized, ‘Hebrew Bible’]” change Scripture through “process,” “traditioning.” In Judaism tradition is not fixed or faithful, but is an ever changing “process” that is described as “traditioning.” This is why “the latest Responsa and homiletical interpretations of the rabbis” are Torah, [definition #4] hence authoritative in Judaism.
Indeed all this oral “traditioning” is precisely what Jesus fingered as “make void the commandments of God for the traditions of men.” [Mark 7:9]. Since the rabbis are free to “alter even the very content of Mosaic revelation” with impunity, we begin to understand why Jesus said, “there is one that accuseth you, Moses” [John 5:45-47].
Do not be misled by a rabbi's mere mention of the word Torah. You must pin him down: "Which 'Torah'?" Then watch out for the pilpul, mental reservations, and Kol Nidre deceit that will inevitably follow.
“Jewish Mysticism- According to Rabbi Steinsaltz, Jewish mysticism – or Kabbalah – is the official theology of the Jewish people. Although the world of Kabbalah is profoundly symbolic and abstract, its teachings are of tremendous significance to the individual and to society alike. Its influences are evident in all Jewish spheres – the prayer book, the Talmud, and Jewish philosophy. Kabbalah is not a separate area of Torah knowledge, but rather the hidden, spiritual dimension of the revealed aspects of the Torah. These revealed facets of Torah – such as halakha (Jewish law) – speak primarily about visible, physical things; Kabbalah, on the other hand, speaks directly about spiritual entities, like the system of olamot (spiritual “worlds,” or graduated levels of reality) and sefirot (divine “attributes,” or channels of divine energy) through which God creates, sustains and directs the universe. It also discusses the interaction between those entities and the performance of mitzvot in the physical world. It is for this reason that Kabbalah has been called the soul of the Torah.
The character of Kabbalah is perhaps manifested most clearly in Hasidut. By changing the terminology of Kabbalah yet maintaining its messages, Hasidut offers a simpler, more accessible way of unlocking its secrets. The Hasidic movement, which has prompted dramatic changes in the outlook of the Jewish people, began in the late 18th century with the teachings of Rabbi Yisrael Ba’al Shem Tov. By re-emphasizing the value of every Jew, the Ba’al Shem Tov provided his disciples with the opportunity to link the individual closer to the Almighty. Hasidism has breathed new vitality into Jewish life, offering an alternate route to the arduous and, for some, unattainable path of study.”
http://steinsaltz.org/dynamic/content.asp?id=65
"Talmud --- The authoritative body of Jewish law and lore accumulated over a period of seven centuries (c. 200 BCE - c. 500 CE) in Erets Israel and Babylonia." —The New Encyclopedia of Judaism, Geoffrey Wigider, editor in Chief, New York: New York University Press, 2002, ISBN 0814793996, page 747
TORAH ON HOMOS, BESTIALITY,COPROPHAGIA, & PEDOPHILES
"object of sodomy. If a boy under the age of nine perpetrated sodomy upon an adult, the adult is not liable for punishment, for the intercourse of a boy under nine years of age is not legally an act of intercourse. Since a child less than nine years old cannot commit sodomy, he can also not be the object of sodomy....This Baraita supports Rav, for it teaches that if a man engaged in homosexual intercourse with a child under the age of nine, he is exempt from liability." Sanhedrin 54b
"…intercourse with a boy under nine years old is not considered a significant sexual act..." Ketubot 11b
"If a girl is less than three years old, it is permitted to be secluded with her. Likewise, if a boy is less than nine years old a woman is permitted to be alone with him." Kitzur Shulchan Aruch: A Classic Guide to Jewish Law (Metsudah Publications, 1996) v. 2, p. 1023
"If a grown up man has intercourse with a little girl, it is nothing, for having intercourse with a girl less than three years old is like putting a finger in the eye." Ketuboth 11b
There is also the Torah’s excuse for "unwitting" sodomy [Sanhedrin 54b] as if such an unnatural and intrinsically difficult act could be accidental. As Hoffman opines, such a loophole is "beneath contempt." Judaism Discovered: A Study of the Anti-Biblical Religion of Racism, Self-Worship, Superstition, and Deceit. ISBN 13: 9780970378453 pp. 676-705.
At tractate Yebamoth 63a the Torah teaches that "Adam had intercourse with all the beasts and animals" in the Garden of Eden. At tractate Gittin 69b the Torah teaches that the cure of a catarrh is to "take the excrement of a white dog kneaded with balsam." Then, of course, the rabbis still perform their oral circumcision ritual Mezizah b'peh on little boys, sometimes causing the death of innocent babies. http://www.nytimes.com/2005/08/26/nyregion/26circumcise.html
Go to http://www.jewishencyclopedia.com/view.jsp?artid=514&letter=C&search=circumcision#1811 then scroll down to:
Mezizah:
By this is meant the sucking of the blood from the wound. The mohel takes some wine in his mouth and applies his lips to the part involved in the operation, and exerts suction, after which he expels the mixture of wine and blood into a receptacle (see Fig. 4, below) provided for the purpose. This procedure [repeatedly sucking the boy'sprivates] is repeated several times, and completes the operation, except as to the control of the bleeding and the dressing of the wound.
DEICIDE
On Passover Eve they hanged Jesus of Nazareth. And the herald went out before him for forty days: 'Jesus of Nazareth is going out to be stoned because he practiced sorcery, incited [to idol worship] and led Israel astray. Whoever knows an argument in his favor should come and argue on his behalf.' But they did not find an argument in his favor, and they hanged him on Passover Eve ... Jesus ... had close connections with the non-Jewish authorities, and those authorities were interested in his acquittal. Thus it was necessary to give him all the opportunity to clear himself, so that the justice of his conviction not be challenged ... Was Jesus of Nazareth deserving of a search for an argument in his favor? He was an inciter, and the Torah (lit., "the Merciful") says: "You shall not spare, nor shall you conceal him"! (Babylonian Talmud, Sanhedrin 43a, Steinsaltz edition, Vol XVII, Part III)
***
... the Talmud [Torah SheBeal Peh] is here offering a subtle commentary upon Jesus' political connections. The Gospels portray the Roman governor Pontius Pilate as going to great lengths to spare Jesus (Mark 15: 6-15). Although this passage may well have been written to appease the Roman authorities and blame the Jews, the Talmudic passage points in the same direction ...
... the passage suggests rabbinic willingness to take responsibility for the execution of Jesus. No effort is made to pin his death upon the Romans. In all likelihood, the passage in question emanates from fourth-century Babylon, then the center of Talmudic scholarship, and beyond the reach of both Rome and Christianity. Although several hundred years had elapsed since the lifetime of Jesus, and therefore this is not at all a contemporary source, the Talmudic passage indicates rabbinic willingness to acknowledge, at least in principle, that in a Jewish court and in a Jewish land, a real-life Jesus would indeed have been executed ... ("Jesus in the Talmud," Steven Bayme, American Jewish Committee National Director, September 24, 2003)
http://web.archive.org/web/20030925214732/http://www.ajc.org/inthemedia/RelatedArticles.asp?did=933
***
The very fact that the Talmud's claim of Jesus' closeness to the Roman government reflects some knowledge ... of the New Testament narrative, particularly of John's version of it ... this detail exonerates the Roman government from the blame of Jesus' condemnation and consequently, adopting the Gospels' message, puts the thrust of the accusation on the Jews ... What we then have here in the [Babylonian Talmud] is a powerful confirmation of the New Testament Passion narrative, a creative rereading, however, that not only knows some of its distinct details but proudly proclaims Jewish responsibility of Jesus' execution. (Jesus in the Talmud, Peter Schafer, Princeton University Press, pp.73-74)
Schafer not only adduces the explicit references to Jesus of Nazareth, but he also traces the code words used in the Talmud editions expurgated and sanitized for Gentile consumption. Schafer traces from edition to tractate to folio how "Balaam," "that man," "the carpenter," "ben Pandera" (son of Pandera), the blank spaces and the rest of the code words refer to Jesus of Nazareth. So, as has so many times been demonstrated, Schafer shows the Talmud teaches that Jesus was a "mamzer" [bastard] conceived adulterously in "niddah" [menstrual filth] by a Roman soldier named Pandera [Kallah 51a] of a whore [Sanhedrin 106a] and that He is now in Hell boiling in feces and, in some editions because Jesus is accused of sexual perversion, semen [Gittin 57a]. Schafer documents much more, including the Talmud claim that the Sanhedrin justly executed Jesus because he was an idolater [Sanhedrin 43a] who worshipped a brick [Sanhedrin 67a], even boasting that the Sanhedrin overcame Roman opposition to the execution of Jesus [Sanhedrin 43a].
MEGALOMANIA
The Koliner rebbe [17th century rabbi of Prague] states: "Our Zaddikim's (famous Orthodox rabbis) words are more important than the Torah of Moses As our Sages teach: A Zaddik decrees, and God obeys." Jeremy Dauber, Antonio's Devils: Writers of the Jewish Enlightenment and the Birth of Modern Hebrew and Yiddish Literature, Stanford University, 2004, ISBN-13: 978-0804749015, p. 276, also documented in Judaism Discovered, p. 298
"... The rabbi constituted the projection of the divine on earth. Honor was due him more than to the scroll of the Torah, for through his learning and logic he might alter the very content of Mosaic revelation. He was Torah, not merely because he lived by it, but because at his best he constituted as compelling an embodiment of the heavenly model as did a Torah scroll itself." [Rabbi Jacob Neusner, "The Phenomenon of the Rabbi in Late Antiquity: II The Ritual of 'Being a Rabbi' in Later Sasanian Babylonia," Numen, Vol.17, Fasc. 1., Feb., 1970, pp.3-4]
“The [Pharisaic-Rabbinic] schools believed that in heaven God and the angels studied Torah [ie. Talmud/Kabbalah] just as the rabbis did on earth. God donned phylacteries like a rabbi. He prayed in rabbinic mode ... He guided the affairs of the world according to the rules of the Torah, like the rabbi in his court. One exegesis of the Creation-legend taught that God had looked into the Torah and therefrom had created the world. Moreover, heaven was aware above of what the rabbis in particular thought, said, and did below. The myth of the Torah was multi-dimensional. It included the striking detail that whenever the most recent rabbi was destined to discover through proper exegesis of the tradition was as much of a part of the way revealed to Moses as was a sentence of Scripture itself. It was therefore possible to participate in the giving of the law, as it were, by appropriate, logical inquiry into the law. God himself, studying and living by Torah, was believed to subject himself to these same rules of logical inquiry, so if an earthly court overruled the testimony, delivered through some natural miracles, of the heavenly one, God would rejoice, crying out, ‘My sons have conquered me! My sons have conquered me!’
TORAH IN THE TOILET
“ After each bowel movement or urination, even of one drop, you should wash your hands and recite the berachah, asher yatzar. If you urinated or moved your bowels and forgot to recited the berachah, asher yatzar, and after urinating or moving your bowels again, you remembered that you did not recite the berachah, you need to recite the berachah only once. After partaking of a laxative that induces diarrhea, and you know that you will use the toilet numerous times, you should not recite the berachah until after all excrement has passed through you.” Berakoth 23a
“And our rabbis taught: One who goes to the bathroom in Judea should not do so east and west, but rather north and south. In Galilee he should do so only east and west…. It has been taught: Rabbi Akiva said: once I went in the bathroom and spied upon Rabbi Joshua while he was on the toilet, and I learned from him three things. I learned that one does not sit east and west, but north and south; I learned that one defecates not standing but sitting; and I learned that it is proper to wipe with the left hand and not with the right. R. Tanhum said: ‘Whoever behaves modestly in a bathroom is delivered from three things: from snakes, from scorpions, and from evil spirits and disturbing dreams.” Berakoth 61b-62a
“… it is permitted to brush off drops of urine even with one’s right hand, and one may use that hand to kill a louse. When one urinates while standing, and many drops of urine will fall on his feet if he does not lift his penis, he is permitted to raise it by lifting his testicles. If the drops of urine fall on his feet, he should clean them off immediately with his hands and not walk among people in this manner (since drops of urine on a person’s feet may arouse the suspicion that his penis is mutilated and his children are illegitimate). Him not hold the penis itself to raise it, for ‘ he who holds his organ is considered as if he brought a flood upon the world,’ lest he become aroused and emit seed wastefully. [This stringency applies] unless he holds the penis from the corona downward, i.e., towards the ground, for this will not arouse him. Alternatively, he may hold [his organ] with a thick cloth, for this too will not arouse him. When a person is married, and his wife is in the same city as he is, and she is ritually pure, the letter of the law permits him to hold his penis even above the corona.” Niddah 13a -43a
TORAH ON WOMEN
"...a man may do whatever he pleases with his wife at intercourse: Meat which comes from the abattoir may be eaten salted, roasted, cooked or seethed; so with fish from the fishmonger.... A woman came before Rab and complained [of her husband's sodomy with her], "Rabbi replied: 'Wherein does it differ from fish?" Nedarim 20b, Soncino edition, p.58
Thanks to the encyclopedic tome by Michael Hoffman, "Judaism Discovered: A Study of the Anti-Biblical Religion of Racism, Self-Worship, Superstition, and Deceit" (ISBN9780970378453):
The birth of a girl is a sad occurrence. Baba Bathra 16b
Women are a "Vain treasure" to their fathers. Sanhedrin 110b
"Thank you God for not making me a gentile, a woman, or a slave." Menahoth 43b-44a
"If two women sit at a crossroads, one on this side and the other on the other side, and they face one another, they are certainly witches." Pesahim 111a
A woman who had intercourse with a beast is eligible to marry a Jewish priest. A woman who has sex with a demon is also eligible to marry a Jewish priest. Yebamoth 59b
It is not good to talk to women, not even your own wife. Aboth
Women are lightheaded. Kiddushin 29b
It is permissible to divorce your wife if she burns your dinner, or if you see a prettier girl. Gittin 91a
"... the best of women is filled with witchcraft." Kiddushin 66c
"...the more wives, the more witchcraft." Mishnah Abot 2:7
Gentile women are "Niddah, Shifchah, Goyyah, and Zonah" (menstrual filth, slaves, heathens, and whores) Sanhedrin 81b-82a
"At the end of those seven days, during which the woman is supposed to wear white underwear and sleep on white sheets to detect spotting, she inserts a white cloth deep into her vaginal canal. Some also use cloth wadding that they leave in place for about 20 minutes at sunset. If the cloth is clean, the woman then visits a ritual bath, or mikvah. for purification and intimate marital relations are permitted to resume. If the cloth is not clean, there are rules about which stains are insignificant and which require another seven-day period of cleanliness. In some cases, the cloth is brought to a rabbi for inspection." Doborah Sonntag, "Jerusalem Journal: Women Seizing Counseling Role on 'Family Purity'" New York Times, April 11, 2001
http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9C0CE1DB1631F932A25757C0A9679C8B63&sec=&spon=&pagewanted=all
“An intricate set of laws has been established by the rabbis for regulating the woman's contact with others during her Niddah (menstruation) time. Many of these laws (though not all) are derived from the binding and authoritative post-Talmudic Tur and Shulchan Aruch halachic codifications. During that time she has the status of a Niddah, the following are forbidden:
1. Women may not engage in frivolous or lightheaded conduct such as excessive laughter or joking.
2. She may not engage in sports or games,
3. The use of cosmetics during the Niddah status is prohibited, with the loophole being that if she needs cosmetics to keep her from appearing hideous in her husband's eyes, a moderate amount may be applied.
4. A husband may not touch his wife when she is a Niddah; not even his small finger may touch her. A woman may not touch her husband when she is a NIddah, not even her small finger may touch him.
5. It is prohibited to touch her even through clothing or outer garments. Therefore the clothing she is wearing cannot be touched.
6. Handing an object into her hands, or receiving it from her is prohibited, even if the object is a long one.
7. If the kallah (bride) at her own wedding is Niddah, then the chasan (groom) may only place the ring on his future wife's finger it he can do so without touching her fingers. It is prohibited to pass a child from a father's hands to the mother's hands while the mother is Niddah.
8. The husband may not kiss a child who is in the mother's arms, nor may the mother kiss a child in her husband's arms.
9. The husband may not place an object into his wife's pocket or handbag, shopping bag or anything she is carrying. Similarly he may not remove anything from the pockets, purses or bags.
10. Throwing an object in the husband's hand to his wife's lap, or throwing an object from the wife's lap to her husband's hand, is prohibited. Certain poskim hold that the husband or the wife is permitted to throw an object upward and the other may catch it as it falls (as long as this is not done for enjoyment)
11. When a woman who is a Niddah is invited to serve as the kvatter (the person designated to carry the infant boy to the circumcision), she must decline the offer.
12. Picking up a light-weight object is prohibited to the husband if his wife is touching it.
13. It is not permissible for a husband to sit on his wife's bed when she is a Niddah, even if she is not present.
14. The husband should refrain from blowing off a feather or dust off his wife's garments. Fanning her or blowing on her (e.g., in hot weather) is prohibited. It is similarly prohibited for her to do these things for her husband.
15. One may not light a candle or a cigarette from a lit candle from a match which his wife is holding, nor may he warm himself from its heat.
16. It is permissible for a wife to hold the Havdallah candle for her husband, even though he will benefit from its light. However, since handing or receiving is prohibited, he may not hand the candle to her before Havdallah nor may he receive it from her after Havdallah, to extinguish it.
17. Eating or drinking together at the same table is prohibited.
18. Eating or drinking together at the same table may be allowed if there is a visible obstruction present.
19. An object which is usually not on the table, such as a vase or candlestick, may be utilized as a divider when eating or drinking together at the same table.
20. A husband and wife may not eat from the same plate.
21. This applies only when the food is eaten immediately upon removal from the plate. However where a plate of food is placed on the table, it is permissible for both of them to remove food from the plate and place it onto their individual plates and then eat it from their own plates.
22. Not all types of food are included in the prohibition. Only those foods which only a husband and wife would consume from the same dish (for example, soup from the same bowel) are forbidden. Those foods which two strangers would share from the same communal bowl (popcorn etc.) are permissible.
23. The husband may not drink from a beverage in a glass that his wife was drinking from, with the following exceptions: if a child drank from the glass or cup after his wife drank from it; if the contents of the glass or cup was transferred to another cup, glass or bottle; if she drank from a glass or cup and then left the room, the husband may drink the beverage remaining in her cup.
24. Laying together in the same bed is prohibited, no matter how big or wide the bed.
25. Sleeping in separate beds which touch each other is forbidden. There must be sufficient distance between the separate beds so that the husband cannot roll from his bed to hers, one cubit (approx 26 inches) minimum.
26. A woman who is Niddah may not visit a Judaic cemetery.”
Michael Hoffman, Judaism Discovered: A Study of the Anti-Biblical Religion of Racism, Self-Worship, Superstition, and Deceit, ISBN9780970378453, p. 745-747.
Of course you need to know WHEN those rules apply and WHEN different rules apply, so you need to know the rules that define Niddah and the complex rabbinical rules of menstrual science, stains which are Niddah and which are not, hence:
"At the end of those seven days, during which the woman is supposed to wear white underwear and sleep on white sheets to detect spotting, she inserts a white cloth deep into her vaginal canal. Some also use cloth wadding that they leave in place for about 20 minutes at sunset. If the cloth is clean, the woman then visits a ritual bath, or mikvah. for purification and intimate marital relations are permitted to resume. If the cloth is not clean, there are rules about which stains are insignificant and which require another seven-day period of cleanliness. In some cases, the cloth is brought to a rabbi for inspection." Doborah Sonntag, "Jerusalem Journal: Women Seizing Counseling Role on 'Family Purity'" New York Times, April 11, 2001
http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9C0CE1DB1631F932A25757C0A9679C8B63&sec=&spon=&pagewanted=all
This is critically important because: "Phariseeism begins in menstrual blood." Rabbi Jacob Neusner in Charlotte Elisheva Fonrobert, Menstrual Purity (Stanford University Press, 2000) p. 125.
Menstrual science of the rabbis according to Mishnah Niddah 2:6-7
2:6
A. Five colors of blood are unclean in a woman:
B. (1) the red, and (2) the black, and (3) bright crocus color, and (4) blood which is like water mixed with earth, and (5) blood which is like water mixed with wine.
C. The House of Shammai say, “Also: (6) blood the color of water in which fenugreek has been soaked, and (7) blood the color of gravy from roast meat.”
D. And the House of Hillel declare clean.
E. Blood which is yellow
F. Aqavya b. Mahallel declares unclean.
G. And sages declare clean.
H. Said R[abbi] Meir, “If it does not impart uncleannesaa because it is a bloodstain, it imparts uncleanness because it is a liquid.”
I. R[abbi] Yose says, “Neither thus or so.:
2:7
A. What is the red color?
B. Like the blood of a wound.
C. Black?
D. Like ink sediment.
E. If it is deeper than this, it is unclean, but if it is lighter than this, it is clean.
F. And bright crocus color?
G. Like the brightest shade in it.
H. Like earthy water?
I. A color like that produced when over dirt from the valley of Bet Kerem water is made to float.
J. A color like water mixed with wine?
K. Two parts water, and one part of wine
L. making use of wine of Shaon.
TRUTH IS NO “LIBEL”
The son of the Chief Rabbi of Rome, Israeli Prof. Ariel Toaff, documented the Ashkenazi cult of ritual child murder:
Toaff, Ariel. Pasque di Sangue: Ebrei d’Europa e omicidi rituali [Bloody Passover: European Jews and Ritual Homicide] (Bologna, Italy: Il Mulino, 2007). An English translation is available at http://www.israelshamir.net/BLOODPASSOVER.pdf
Under great ADL duress (Wagner, Matthew & AP, “‘Blood Libel’ Author halts press,” The Jerusalem Post, February 14, 2007, http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1170359860024&pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull) Toaff penned a censored second edition with the profits promised to the ADL.
“It has been clearly proven that the Jew Juce Franco did seduce some Christians to the rites and ceremonies of the Law of Moses by teaching them Jewish prayers, praying in Hebrew to the Creator to whom he commended them, and telling them that the Law of Moses was the true law, whereas the Law of Christ was false. He also taught them the times of the Jewish Passover and other Fasts, and explained to them why the Jews did not eat certain meats. He further did communicate to and participate with these same Christians in other mysteries of his Jewish law, serving them Jewish foods and wine, eating and drinking with them the better to confirm them in the Law of Moses. …This Juce Franco personally took part, together with other Jews and with Christians [Marranos], in the crucifixion –at night and in a secret cave– of an innocent Christian boy. They stretched out his arms and legs on two boards arranged in the form of a Cross. Then they flogged him, spat on him, beat him, tore out the pieces of his flesh and put a crown of thorns on his head. This Juce Franco, with his own hands seized the bleeding boy by the arm, cut open his side with a knife and took out his heart. Then he beat him and tore his flesh in memory and vituperation of the Sacred Passion of Jesus Christ our Redeemer, uttering curses and insults on the Person of Christ as though He were actually on the Cross. And while they were flogging the said youth, they said to him: “This traitor and deceiver, when he preached, spoke lies against the Law of God and the Law of Moses.”
“Now you will pay for the things you said and did in that ancient time. You thought you would abase us and exalt yourself, for which you shall suffer even more evil than this. You thought you would destroy us, but we will destroy you. Crucify him. crucify him —this dog, this swindler, this deceiver and bewitcher! He called himself King of the Jews. But he was a mere man, like any other, a bastard born in adultery, the son of a corrupt and adulterous woman. He tried to destroy the Jews and their Law, but it is he who will be destroyed by us, for coming to turn the Jews into Christians with his deceptions and witchcraft.” These words and vituperations this Juce Franco and the other Jews first taught to these Christians [Marranos], who then imitated these Jews in the same manner, repeating the same vituperations and others of the same kind. And after the child had been tortured and crucified by this Juce Franco and the others, they killed him, took him down from the Cross, and took him away and secretly buried him that same night where no one could find him. Some days later this Jew, Juce Franco, and all his other accomplices in this crime, met together secretly in the same cave, where they performed certain conjuring and experiments in witchcraft with the heart of the dead boy and a consecrated Communion wafer. They performed these conjurings with the perverted and diabolical intention of making the Inquisitors against heretical depravity together with all other Christians go mad and die of madness, and of subverting, and destroying and killing the Holy Faith of Jesus.”
Longhurst, John Edward. “The Ritual Murder of La Guardia,” The Age of Torquemada. The Library of Iberian Resources Online, XI: 149-152. http://libro.uca.edu/torquemada/torquemada11.htm
See also:
Walsh, William Thomas. The Last Crusader: Isabella of Spain (Rockford IL: Tan Books, 1987) Chapter 25, “The Crucifixion of the Holy Child of La Guardia Hastens Isabel's Decision to Expel All the Jews from Spain - a Cause Célèbre,” 342-372
HOLOCAUST PERPETRATED BY JUDEO-BOLSHEVISM
See Part 1, especially “JEWISH TESTIMONY,” at http://www.catholicvoice.co.uk/pinay/
Regarding the genocide of over 60 million at the hands of Judeo-Bolshevism:
http://www.amazon.de/Zweihundert-Jahre-zusammen-Alexander-Solschenizyn/dp/3776622873/ref=sr_1_4/303-7529902-7614619?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1208532801&sr=8-4
AND
http://www.amazon.de/Zweihundert-Jahre-zusammen-Juden-Sowjetunion/dp/3776650206/ref=sr_1_5/303-7529902-7614619?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1208532801&sr=8-5
DEATH TOLL: 61.9 million
http://www.hawaii.edu/powerkills/MEGA.HTM
“HOLOCAUST”
Even today the rabbis speak approvingly of Hitler's work as divine retribution. Revealingly the rabbis have been saying approving things about Hitler and his "holocaust" for half a century, Chabad Lubavitch Grand Rabbi (and erstwhile "Messiah") Schneerson among them [Yehuda Bauer, "God as surgeon." Haaretz, June 1, 2007]. www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/865718.html www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/868474.html
Rabbi Elizer Schach, founder of the "Israeli" Shas Party: "Does anyone here think that before the holocaust, which exacted such a terrible price and left no family untouched all the Jews of Europe were righteous, God-fearing folk? There was a drift away from our faith and way of life. What happened was divine retribution for the accumulated weight of years of drifting away from Judaism." Mordecai Richter, National Post (Canada), August 26, 2000.
"Israeli" Rabbi Ovadia Yosef stated that those who died in the Nazi persecutions were "reincarnated sinners" who got what they deserved, that Hitler "was simply the messenger of God sent to give the Jewish people their just desserts." Jack Katzenell, "Rabbi Says Holocaust Victims Were Reincarnations of Sinners." The Independent (UK), August 6, 2000. http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/middle-east/rabbi-says-holocaust-victims-were-reincarnations-of-sinners-711547.html
The Judaic Trotskyite Lennie Brenner documented ZIONIST COLLUSION WITH THE NAZIS in his book, "51 Documents: Zionist Collaboration with the Nazis," ISBN 9781569802359.
Yes, the rabbis were ---and still are--- most happy that Nazi persecution served their purposes, the advancement of Zionism and consolidation of rabbinic power and prestige. All forms of genuine anti-semitism (not to be confused with the ADL/Abe Foxman variety of “anything–we-don’t-like-is-anti-semitism”) have served the purposes of the rabbis. Where anti-semitism has not existed, Judaics have had to fabricate, fund, and foster it. Much, but not all, synagogue and grave vandalism has been perpetrated by Judaics themselves.
Among many: Michael Kallenbach, "Stasi Files Reveal Links to Anti-Semitic Attacks in Former West Germany." Jewish Chronicle (UK), March 12, 1993. "...10 out of 14 [neo-Nazi] party members... were exposed as being in the pay of regional state intelligence services." Sunday Telegraph (UK), March 12, 2003.
"In the 1960s the leader of the Canadian Nazi Party was John Beattie. '[E]verything from his group's name to its major activities was suggested or quarterbacked by persons acting as agents for, or reporting to the Canadian Jewish Congress.... The Canadian Jewish Congress, which largely created the short-lived Canadian Nazi Party, had, since the 1930s been lobbying for restrictions on freedom of speech.... an agent for the Canadian Jewish Congress proposed [to Beattie] legal maneuvers that were calculated to frighten and cause distress among Jews, thus heightening the 'Nazi' menace, which was used as the argument for the 1971 'hate law' (Section 319 of the canadian Criminal Code..." Testimony of Paul Fromm, Canadian Association of Free Expression, press release, Nov. 26, 2000; Patrick Walsh, "The John Beattie Case," in "The Unholy Alliance: A Documented Case of How Agents Provo." Canadian Intelligence Publications, 1986. p. 13.cateur Infiltrate and Misdirect
"In the 1990s, Grant Bristow, an associate of the Canadian Jewish Congress and an agent of Canada's secret service, the CSIS (Canadian Security Intelligence Service), took a leadership role in the Right-wing German-Canadian advocacy group, the "Heritage Front," including supplying them with money. 'Bristow frequently advocated violence against Jews... Bristow compiled a target list of prominent Jews. He was far more than a mere informant or spy. He was a player, a string advocate of violence and lawlessness and an anti-Jewish agitator.' Heritage Front members eventually succumbed to Bristow's agitation, going to a tavern known to be a hangout for Marxists and Zionists. A fight ensued and Heritage Front members were arrested. The group eventually disbanded, but not before generating plenty of 'Jew hater' publicity in the media, very useful to Zionist and rabbinic interests." [Paul Fromm, "CSIS Spy Bristow Speaks to Canadian Jewish Congress." August 4, 2003 in Michael Hoffman, Judaism Discovered: A Study of the Anti-Biblical Religion of Racism, Self-Worship, Superstition, and Deceit, ISBN9780970378453, p. 833.
The lesson is clear. Genuine anti-semitism serves the rabbis’ purposes. Catholics are called to emulate Jesus, not Hitler or the Canadian Jewish Congress or the Judaics and Judaic organizations named by Brenner as colluding with Hitler for the destruction of their own people.
ZIONISM’S TERRORISM AND HOLOCAUST
July 2, 1946: The Bombing of the King David Hotel masterminded by Menachem Begin, 91 dead
April 9, 1948: Irgun and Stern Gang massacre 260 Arab civilians in Deir Yassin [http://www.deiryassin.org]
Sept 17, 1948: Yitzhak Shamir's Stern Gang assassinate Swedish peace mediator, Count Folke Bernadotte
October 14-15, 1953: Ariel Sharon commands attack on Qibya, 42 homes destroyed, 60 civilians killed
Holy Week 1954 Israelis desecrate Christian cemeteries in Haifa
July 14, 1954: Israeli Army intelligence, Modin, firebombs civilian post office in Egypt
1956 terrorist atrocity in Kafr Qasim, 47 cold blooded murders
1966, village of Sammu attacked, 18 dead, 100 wounded
1967 USS Liberty attacked 34 sailors dead, 170 wounded -- not civilians, but non-participants
June 5, 1967, "In danger of being attacked" Israel launches war, 759 Israelis and 15,000 Arabs dead
1969 Israeli bombing of school Bahdr al Baker, 75 children dead, 100 wounded
March 1, 1970, Israel invades Lebanon, civilian death toll unknown
Sept 8, 1972 Israeli bombing of Syrian and Lebanese civilians, "hundreds dead"
1974: Israeli terrorists attack civilian aircraft; desecrate Christian shrines including Church of the Holy Sepulcher, stealing the diamond crown of the statue of the Blessed Virgin Mary
1975-1980: numerous Mossad assassinations of Palestinian scientists, journalists, and others
August 1982: 20,000 civilians dead from Israeli bombing of Beirut on the orders of Ariel Sharon
September 1982 massacres of the Sabra and Shatila refugee camps, 800 women, children, and elderly killed
October 1982: Israeli terrorists bombed houses, cars, and offices of three elected mayors of the West Bank cities, Nablus, Ramallah, and Al Beireh
1984 kidnapping of Palestinians on the high seas off merchant vessels
1986 Palestinian cartoonist, Naj Al Ali, assassinated
April 1988 Israeli commandos invade the home of Khalil Al Wazir, a Palestinian leader, and shoot him in bed
February-March 1989 Israeli jets bomb Beka Valley, 15 children killed, more adults
April 14, 1989 Israeli police and armed Jewish settlers attack disarmed Palestinian village, Nahalin, 8 killed, 50 wounded
February 1994 Kach Party terrorist Baruch Goldstein uses assault rifle to murder 29 Palestinians worshipping at Hebron mosque, rabbis praise his actions and then Prime Minister Yitshak Rabin gives permission\ for a memorial to honor Goldstein
February 27, 1994 Israeli Mossad bombs Our Lady of Deliverance Maronite Catholic Chuirch at Jounieh, Lebanon, 11 killed.
1996 Israeli massacre of civilians at Qana, Lebanon
April 14, 2000, homes of civilians bulldozed (actions admitted by Ha'aretz and praised by the canonized "Holocaust survivor" Elie Wiesel)
Dec. 10, 2001. “Palestinian activist Muhammad Sidir, 24, had his face maimed and burned and his eyes blinded by a U.S. made Israeli helicopter firing missiles in a crowded intersection during an assassination attempt on Sidir. Two Palestinian children died in the attacks and two other children were injured. Israeli helicopter gunships hovered over the carnage for five minutes, preventing immediate medical attention from being administered to the wounded and dying.” [http://www.revisionisthistory.org/palestine7.html]
December 17, 2001 Israeli troops murder Palestinian activist Yacoub Aidkadik
January 14, 2002 assassination of Palestinian resistance leader Raed al-Karmi
January 24, 2002 assassination of Elie Hobeika who was preparing to testify at a war crimes trial in Belgium against his former ally Ariel Sharon regarding Sharon’s masterminding of the Sabra and Chatila massacres
March 6-16, 2002. 200 Palestinian civilians slaughtered in Jabalya refugee camp in the Gaza ghetto
http://www.revisionisthistory.org/palestine51.html
March 30, 2002, 5 Palestinian bank guards summarily executed in Ramallah
April 8, 2002 et seq., bombardment of the Church of the Nativity, Bethlehem, the only major church in the Holy Land that had survived intact from the early Christian period
April 9, 2002 (ironically on Yom Has Shoa, "Holocaust Remembrance Day"): Israeli massacre of 52 Palestinian civilians in Jenin
May 20, 2002 Mossad car bombing of Mohammed Jibril, Palestinian leader
http://www.revisionisthistory.org/palestine7.html
March 16, 2003 Rachel Corrie, 23, was crushed to death by an Israeli army bulldozer in Rafah, Gaza, as she protested against house demolitions
http://www.rachelcorrie.org/
http://sf.indymedia.org/news/2003/03/1583823_comment.php
April 11, 2003 Tom Hurndall, 21, from London shot in the head by an Israeli soldier as he tried to help a Palestinian woman and her children. http://www.electronicintifada.net/v2/article1358.shtml
August 4, 2005 timed precisely to interfere with Gaza withdrawal, an Israeli Army “deserter” (or operative?) and Kach Party member Eden Natan-Zada, using an assault rifle, attacked a bus killing 4, wounding 12 Palestinians [http://www.washtimes.com/world/20050804-110426-6510r.htm]
July-August 2006 Israelis bomb Lebanon for 33 days, preliminary death toll 1,300 http://news.independent.co.uk/world/fisk/article1219684.ece, Lebanon’s infrastructure destroyed, termed “bombed into the stone age.”
November 18, 2006 Swedish human rights worker beaten, 5 Palestinians (including a 3-year-old child) beaten and stoned while the assailants chanted, “We killed Jesus and we’ll kill you too!” http://www.palsolidarity.org/main/2006/11/18/hebron-day-06/
February 6, 2007 Foul mouthed drunken Talmudist harasses Palestinians on their land, “You and your f@#king Jesus can kiss my a$%....We killed Jesus and we’re proud of it...” http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=e1842edc4f
2007 Amnesty International Report "Increased violence between Israelis and Palestinians resulted in a threefold increase in killings of Palestinians by Israeli forces. The number of Israelis killed by Palestinian armed groups diminished by half. More than 650 Palestinians, including some 120 children, and 27 Israelis were killed. Israeli forces carried out air and artillery bombardments in the Gaza Strip, and Israel continued to expand illegal settlements and to build a 700-km fence/wall on Palestinian land in the Occupied Territories. Military blockades and increased restrictions imposed by Israel on the movement of Palestinians and the confiscation by Israel of Palestinian customs duties caused a significant deterioration in living conditions for Palestinian inhabitants in the Occupied Territories, with poverty, food aid dependency, health problems and unemployment reaching crisis levels. Israeli soldiers and settlers committed serious human rights abuses, including unlawful killings, against Palestinians, mostly with impunity. Thousands of Palestinians were arrested by Israeli forces throughout the Occupied Territories on suspicion of security offences and hundreds were held in administrative detention. Israeli conscientious objectors continued to be imprisoned for refusing to serve in the army. In a 34-day war against Hizbullah in Lebanon in July-August, Israeli forces committed serious violations of international humanitarian law, including war crimes. Israeli bombardments killed nearly 1,200 people, and destroyed or damaged tens of thousands of homes and other civilian infrastructure. Israeli forces also littered south Lebanon with around a million unexploded cluster bombs which continued to kill and maim civilians after the conflict.” http://thereport.amnesty.org/eng/Regions/Middle-East-and-North-Africa/Israel-and-the-Occupied-Territories
May 30, 2007 Former Sephardi Chief Rabbi Mordechai Eliyahu announces “absolutely no moral prohibition against the indiscriminate killing of civilians.” His son, Chief Rabbi of Safed Schmuel Eliyahu added, "If they don't stop after we kill 100, then we must kill a thousand," said Shmuel Eliyahu. "And if they do not stop after 1,000 then we must kill 10,000. If they still don't stop we must kill 100,000, even a million. Whatever it takes to make them stop."
http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1180527966693&pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull
June 1, 2007 "Israeli troops shot and killed two 13-year-old Palestinians [Ahmed Abu Zbeida and Zaher al-Majdalawi] near the Gaza-Israel border fence Friday, saying they were crawling toward the barrier in a ``suspicious manner.'' The boys had told their families they were going to the beach. (Guardian, June 1, 2007)"
http://www.guardian.co.uk/worldlatest/story/0,,-6677257,00.html
July 5, 2007 Slouching Towards a Palestinian Holocaust by Richard Falk
http://www.zmag.org/content/showarticle.cfm?ItemID=13226
November 2007 The International Committee of the Red Cross issues a report on Israel’s inhuman treatment of Palestinians
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/shared/bsp/hi/pdfs/13_12_07palestineicrc.pdf
January 20, 2008 Israelis admit to assassinations
http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/946320.html
March 20, 2008 16 year old son of Protestant pastor injured by bomb in a Purim gift basket http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?c=JPArticle&cid=1205420741251&pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull
May 20, 2008 Orthodox Jewish youths burn New Testaments http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/985362.html
June 5, 2008 (the evening of “Holocaust Remembrance Day) two teenagers stabbed and beaten by dozens of Israelis. Perpetrators released. http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/988477.html
June 6, 2008 Four Israelis beat elderly couple with baseball bats, captured on video.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/7451691.stm
August 2008 Israelis train, instigate, and assist Georgia in attacking South Ossetia
http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/1010187.html
http://www.tbrnews.org/Archives/a2867.htm
http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/1013100.html
http://www.presstv.com/detail.aspx?id=66203§ionid=351020202
http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/1011867.html
See also: Matthew Raphael Johnson, “Israel, Oil and Death: The War for Ossetia,” Culture Wars, October 2008, 6-11 & 25.
October 2008 Israelis terrorize Palestinian olive harvesters, including beating 65-year-old man.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20081026/ap_on_re_mi_ea/ml_palestinians_securing_the_harvest;_ylt=AgJfZuqLkmPSHM7I23SpY2hvaA8F
ISRAELITES
Jeremias 2:13 For my people have done two evils. They have forsaken me, the fountain of living water, and have digged to themselves cisterns, broken cisterns, that can hold no water.
Jeremias 8:7-10 The kite in the air hath known her time: the turtle, and the swallow, and the stork have observed the time of their coming: but my people have not known the judgment of the Lord. How do you say: We are wise, and the law of the Lord is with us? Indeed the lying pen of the scribes hath wrought falsehood. The wise men are confounded, they are dismayed, and taken: for they have cast away the word of the Lord, and there is no wisdom in them. Therefore I will give their women to strangers, their fields to others for an inheritance: because from the least even to the greatest all follow covetousness: from the prophet even to the priest, all deal deceitfully…
Daniel 9:25-27 Know thou therefore, and take notice: that from the going forth of the word, to build up Jerusalem again, unto Christ the prince, there shall be seven weeks, and sixty-two weeks: and the street shall be built again, and the walls in straitness of times.
And after sixty-two weeks Christ shall be slain: and the people that shall deny him shall not be his. And a people with their leader that shall come, shall destroy the city and the sanctuary: and the end thereof shall be waste, and after the end of the war the appointed desolation. And he shall confirm the covenant with many, in one week: and in the half of the week the victim and the sacrifice shall fall: and there shall be in the temple the abomination of desolation: and the desolation shall continue even to the consummation, and to the end.
Osee 4:1-2 Hear the word of the Lord, ye children of Israel, for the Lord shall enter into judgment with the inhabitants of the land: for there is no truth, and there is no mercy, and there is no knowledge of God in the land. Cursing, and lying, and killing, and theft, and adultery have overflowed, and blood hath touched blood.
Osee 5:1-2 Hear ye this, O priests, and hearken, O ye house of Israel, and give ear, O house of the king: for there is a judgment against you, because you have been a snare to them whom you should have watched over, and a net spread upon Thabor. And you have turned aside victims into the depth: and I am, the teacher of them all.
Amos 8:2 And he said: What seest thou, Amos? And I said: A hook to draw down fruit. And the Lord said to me: The end is come upon my people Israel: I will not again pass by them any more.
Amos 9:1 I saw the Lord standing upon the altar, and he said: Strike the hinges, and let the lintels be shook: for there is covetousness in the head of them all, and I will slay the last of them with the sword: there shall be no flight for them: they shall flee, and he that shall flee of them shall not be delivered.
Malachias 2:8-12 But you have departed out of the way, and have caused many to stumble at the law: you have made void the covenant of Levi, saith the Lord of hosts. Therefore have I also made you contemptible, and base before all people, as you have not kept my ways, and have accepted persons in the law. Have we not all one father? hath not one God created us? why then doth every one of us despise his brother, violating the covenant of our fathers? Juda hath transgressed, and abomination hath been committed in Israel, and in Jerusalem: for Juda hath profaned the holiness of the Lord, which he loved, and hath married the daughter of a strange God. The Lord will cut off the man that hath done this, both the master, and the scholar, out of the tabernacles of Jacob, and him that offereth an offering to the Lord of hosts.
PHARISEES
“Further, by divine and Catholic faith, all those things must be believed at which are contained in the written Word of God and in tradition, and those which are proposed by the church, either in a solemn pronouncement [ex cathedra extra ordinary Magisterium ], or in her ordinary and universal teaching power [a.v., “what has always been taught,” ordinary Magisterium ], to be believed as a divinely revealed.” Vatican Council, Session III Dogmatic Constitution Concerning the Catholic Faith (April 24, 1870) in Denziger, Enchiridion Symbolorum, The Sources of Catholic Dogma, §1792
JESUS:
Accused by Moses (John 5:45-47), adversaries to all men (St. Paul in I Thessalonians 2:14), agents of the devil (John 8:44), blind (Matthew 23:26), blind guides (Matthew 23:16, 17, 19, 24), children of Hell (Matthew 23:15), children of the devil (John 8:44), crucifiers (Matthew 23:34), dangerous leaven (Mathew 6:6-12), defectors (Matthew 15:6; Mark 7:9, 13; John 5:45, 46, 47), deicides (St. Paul in I Thessalonians 2:14-15), dogs (Matthew 7:6; Apocalypse 22:16), foolish (Matthew 23:17), full of dead men's bones (Matthew 23:27), haters of God (John 16:24,25; Mark 8:15; Luke 12:1), hypocrites (Matthew 23:13, 14, 15, 23, 25, 27, 28, 29), idolaters (Apocalypse 22:16), iniquitous (Matthew 23:28), killers of the just (Matthew 23:35), killers of the prophets (Matthew 23:37; St. Paul in I Thessalonians 2:14-15), liars (John 8:44, 55; Apocalypse 22:16), murderers (Matthew 23:31; Apocalypse 22:16), offspring of vipers (Luke 3:7), serpents (Matthew 23:33), sorcerers (Apocalypse 22:16), swine (Matthew 7:6), synagogue of Satan (Apocalypse 2:9, 3:9), unchaste (Apocalypse 22:16), unclean (Matthew 23:25), vipers (Matthew 3:7; 12:34; 23:33), and whited sepulchers (Matthew 23:27).
axe laid to the root (Matthew 3:10), cast into the fire (Matthew 3:10; 7:19; Luke 3:9), condemned (Mark 16:16), cut down (Matthew 3:10), in vain do they worship me (Matthew 15:9; Mark 7:7), judgment of Hell (Matthew 23:33), woe (Matthew 23:13, 14, 15, 16, 23, 25, 27; Luke 11:42, 46, 47, 52), wrath (Matthew 3:7; Luke 3:7; 21:23; St. Paul in I Thessalonians 2:16), and you do not enter the kingdom of Heaven (Matthew 23:13)
Think not that I will accuse you to the Father. There is one that accuseth you, Moses, in whom you trust. For if you did believe Moses, you would perhaps believe me also; for he wrote of me. But if you do not believe his writings, how will you believe my words? –John 5:45-47
Who said to them: Take heed and beware of the leaven of the Pharisees and Sadducees…. Why do you not understand that it was not concerning the bread I said to you: Beware of the leaven of the Pharisees and Sadducees? Then they understood that he said not that they should beware of the leaven of bread, but of the doctrine of the Pharisees and Sadducees. —Matthew 16:6-12
And he charged them, saying: Take heed and beware of the leaven of the Pharisees, and of the leaven of Herod. Mark 8:15
And when great multitudes stood about him, so that they trod one upon another, he began to say to his disciples: Beware ye of the leaven of the Pharisees, which is hypocrisy. Luke 12:1
APOSTLES:
Hebrews 7:18: “On the one hand, a former commandment is annulled because of its weakness and uselessness…”;
Hebrews 10:9: “Then he says, ‘Behold, I come to do your will.’ He takes away the first [covenant] to establish the second [covenant]…”;
2 Corinthians 3:14: “For to this day when they [the Jews] read the Old Covenant, that same veil remains unlifted, because only through Christ is it taken away”;
Hebrews 8:7: “For if there had been nothing wrong with that first covenant, no place would have been sought for another”;
Colossians 2:14: “Having canceled the written code, with its decrees, that was against us and stood opposed to us; He took it away nailing it to the cross”
1 Thessalonians 2:14 For you, brethren, are become followers of the churches of God which are in Judea, in Christ Jesus: for you also have suffered the same things from your own coutrymen, even as they have from the Jews, 15 Who both killed the Lord Jesus, and the prophets, and have persecuted us, and please not God, and are adversaries to all men;
INFALLIBLE COUNCILS:
Council of Florence: Ҥ 712 It [the Holy Catholic Church] firmly believes, professes, and teaches that the matter pertaining to the law of the Old Testament, of the Mosaic law, which are divided into ceremonies, sacred rites, sacrifices, and sacraments, because they were established to signify something in the future, although they were suited to Divine worship at that time, after our Lord's coming had been signified by them, ceased, and the Sacraments of the New Testament began; and that whoever, even after the passion, placed hope in these matters of law and submitted himself to them as necessary for salvation, as if faith in Christ could not save without them, sinned mortally. Yet it does not deny that after the passion of Christ up to the promulgation of the Gospel they could have been observed until they were believed to be in no way necessary for salvation; but after the promulgation of the Gospel it asserts they cannot be observed without the loss of eternal salvation. All, therefore, who after that time observe circumcision and the Sabbath and the other requirements of the law, it declares alien to the Christian faith and not in the least fit to participate in eternal salvation, unless someday they recover from these errors....
“§714 The Most Holy Roman Church firmly believes, professes and preaches that none of those existing outside the Catholic Church, not only pagans, but also Jews, and heretics, and schismatics, can ever be partakers of eternal life, but that they are to go into the eternal fire 'which was prepared for the devil, and his angels,' (Matthew 25:41) unless before death they are joined with Her; and that so important is the unity of this Ecclesiastical Body, that only those remaining within this unity can profit from the sacraments of the Church unto salvation, and that they alone can receive an eternal recompense for their fasts, alms deeds, and other works of Christian piety and duties of a Christian soldier. No one, let his almsgiving be as great as it may, no one, even if he pour out his blood for the Name of Christ, can be saved unless they abide within the bosom and unity of the Catholic Church.” ---Cantate Domino, from the infallible ecumenical Council of Florence under His Holiness Pope Eugene IV defining the Solemn Doctrine: Extra Ecclesiam Nulla Salus, promulgated by papal bull, February 4, 1444 [Florentine calendar] in Denziger Enchiridion Symbolorum, The Sources of Catholic Dogma, § 712-714
Council of Trent: “but not even the Jews by the very letter of the law of Moses were able to be liberated or to rise therefrom.”
DOCTORS:
St. Ambrose : “The faithlessness of the Synagogue is an insult to the Savior. Therefore He chose the bark of Peter, and deserted that of Moses; that is, He rejected the faithless Synagogue, and adopts the believing Church.” —St. Ambrose, Doctor of the Church Sermo 37, The Two Ships
St. John Chrysostom: “Yet surely Paul’s object everywhere is to annul this Law….And with much reason; for it was through a fear and a horror of this that the Jews obstinately opposed grace” (Homily on Romans, 6:12); “And so while no one annuls a man's covenant, the covenant of God after four hundred and thirty years is annulled; for if not that covenant but another instead of it bestows what is promised, then is it set aside, which is most unreasonable” (Homily on Galatians, Ch 3);
St. Augustine: “Instead of the grace of the law which has passed away, we have received the grace of the gospel which is abiding; and instead of the shadows and types of the old dispensation, the truth has come by Jesus Christ. Jeremiah also prophesied thus in God’s name: ‘Behold, the days come, says the Lord, that I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel, and with the house of Judah...’ Observe what the prophet says, not to Gentiles, who had not been partakers in any former covenant, but to the Jewish nation. He who has given them the law by Moses, promises in place of it the New Covenant of the gospel, that they might no longer live in the oldness of the letter, but in the newness of the spirit” (Letters, 74, 4)
SAINTS:
St. Justin Martyr: Now, law placed against law has abrogated that which is before it, and a covenant which comes after in like manner has put an end to the previous one; and an eternal and final law – namely, Christ – has been given to us, and the covenant is trustworthy…Have you not read…by Jeremiah, concerning this same new covenant, He thus speaks: ‘Behold, the days come,’ says the Lord, ‘that I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel and with the house of Judah…’” (Dialogue with Trypho, Ch 11).
St. Bernard of Clairvaux: “The Jews must not be persecuted or chased like beasts....They are living signs that remind us of the Passion of our Lord. Besides, they are scattered through the world so that, while they pay for such a crime, they can be the witnesses of our redemption.” —St. Bernard of Clairvaux, Letter #363
POPES:
Pope Innocent IV: "The ... Jews ... omitting or scorning the Mosaic law and the prophets, follow certain traditions of their seniors concerning which the Lord rebukes them in the Gospel, saying: Why do you transgress the mandate of God and irritate Him by your traditions, teaching human doctrines and mandates? [Matthew 15;9]
Upon this sort of traditions, which in Hebrew are called the Talmud--and there is a great book among them exceeding the text of the Bible in length, in which are manifest blasphemies against God and Christ and the blessed Virgin, intricate fables, erroneous abuses, and unheard-of stupidities--they nourish and teach their sons and render them utterly alien from the doctrine of the law and the prophets ..." (Pope Innocent IV, May 9, 1244 Letter to King Louis IX of France)
Pope Pius XII: “…the New Testament took the place of the Old Law which had been abolished…but on the gibbet of His death Jesus made void the Law with its decrees fastened the handwriting of the Old Testament to the Cross” Pope Pius XII, Mystici Corporis, para. 29
Pope Benedict XVI: “Thus the Sinai [Mosaic] Covenant is indeed superseded” (Many Religions – One Covenant, p. 70).
FURTHER EDUCATION
Michael Hoffman, Judaism Discovered: A Study of the Anti-Biblical Religion of Racism, Self-Worship, Superstition, and Deceit, ISBN 9780970378453, available at
http://www.revisionisthistory.org/page1/news.html
Dr. E. Michael Jones, The Jewish Revolutionary Spirit and Its Impact on World History, ISBN 9780929891071, available at
http://www.culturewars.com/
Princeton Professor and Director of Judaic Studies Peter Schafer, Jesus in the Talmud, ISBN 9780691129266, available at
http://www.amazon.com/Jesus-Talmud-Peter-Schafer/dp/0691129266/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1223309188&sr=8-1
Catholics, in particular, will be very interested in:
Leon de Poncins, Judaism and the Vatican, ISBN 9780904656220, available at the book store of
http://www.omnicbc.com
Scratch a Semite and you'll find an anti-Goy....
情趣用品,情趣用品,飛機杯,自慰套,充氣娃娃,AV女優.按摩棒,跳蛋,潤滑液,角色扮演,情趣內衣
免費視訊聊天,辣妹視訊,視訊交友網,美女視訊,視訊交友,視訊交友90739,成人聊天室,視訊聊天室,視訊聊天,視訊聊天室,情色視訊,情人視訊網,視訊美女
一葉情貼圖片區,免費視訊聊天室,免費視訊,ut聊天室,聊天室,豆豆聊天室,尋夢園聊天室,聊天室尋夢園,影音視訊聊天室,
辣妹視訊,美女視訊,視訊交友網,視訊聊天室,視訊交友,視訊美女,免費視訊,免費視訊聊天,視訊交友90739,免費視訊聊天室,成人聊天室,視訊聊天,視訊交友aooyy
哈啦聊天室,辣妺視訊,A片,色情A片,視訊,080視訊聊天室,視訊美女34c,視訊情人高雄網,視訊交友高雄網,0204貼圖區,sex520免費影片,情色貼圖,視訊ukiss
A片下載,成人影片下載,免費A片下載,日本A片
影音視訊聊天室
If Avi is waiting for God's help to zionists, forget it. He vetoed your hope in 70 AD, without prophesy of a third temple. So sorry.
A faithful Presbyterian..........
Post a Comment
Back to Current Posts